I have been to several events in the suburbs now where there was absolutely no vegetarian option available. I take that back, each had a salad made of only greens, croutons and cheese.
I hate salad.
My mouth gets tired of it long before my stomach feels full.
So, I gave in and just ate what was being served. One of the main rules of my burgeoning vegetarianism is that I will never refuse someone's hospitality. Plus, I was at these functions for work and I didn't want to get grumpy because of my hunger.
This experience was unexpected because I feel like every event I have been in the past few years (which all happened to be in the city) have had fairly broad vegetarian options. I notice because Jacob only eats vegetarian when we're not at home. I know that I just plan menus automatically that have vegetarian options built in whenever I am entertaining. (I also make some pretty good vegan or gluten-free, dairy-free, sugar-free dishes.) I just know a lot of people who go that route and I want to make sure they feel welcome.
Does this mean that vegetarianism is still exotic out in the suburbs?
Maybe it's not geographic. My friend who is serving vegetarian food at her wedding has twice had to tell the graphic designer who is creating their invitations (who is a friend of the groom) that she does not need to warn people that no meat will be served at the reception.
Is vegetarianism threatening to people's ideology: the beliefs they have to protect their security?
That's weird to me because I feel late to the party on this one. Almost everyone I know flirted with vegetarianism in college and many people continue to eschew eating animals even into their 30s and beyond.
This is my first jaunt and I find that my wobble a little, but not unpleasantly so.
Still, I might start eating before these suburban events.
4.24.17 - And, he's off! After I squeezed in that family photo - see his foot already halfway out the door? Calvin is fully settled now into Eastern France, though h...